All Solutions

Solution

Automated Defect Detection in Ceramic Roof Tiles

Replacing manual acoustic inspection of ceramic roof tiles with automated impulse excitation testing for reliable in-line crack detection at production speed.

ndtceramicsroof-tilesquality-controlin-line-testing 2 min read

The Challenge

In many roof tile factories, operators still tap each tile and judge its ring by ear to catch internal fissures and cracks. The method tires them, varies from one inspector to the next, and lets defects slip through as false passes or false rejects. On lines running close to 3000 tiles per hour, and for cracks too faint to hear, automated non-destructive testing is the obvious answer, yet the complex geometry of modern tiles, with its valleys, lugs and grooves, makes a robust automated decision hard to engineer.

The Solution

On a French tile plant, GrindoSonic tested one tile model, with and without engobe, across sound parts and parts with light fissures or severe cracks. Impulse excitation applies a light impact and reads the tile’s natural resonance frequencies; because a tile rings in flexural, torsional and longitudinal-compression modes, where you support, strike and listen matters as much as the algorithm. The team built a three-stage learning protocol: learn the tile “free” on foam to map its modes, learn it “captive” on the line’s transport bars to set tolerance windows, then run it live with the automatic hammer. Frequency-sensitivity calculations confirmed the shifts come from cracks, not from engobe, mass, thickness or temperature, leaving three peaks as the OK/NOK criteria: flexural near 615 Hz, longitudinal-compression near 845 Hz and torsional near 1260 Hz.

Results

Light fissures dropped the characteristic frequencies by 3.8 to 6.6 percent and severe cracks by 6.7 to 10.7 percent, far beyond any drift from mass or temperature. At roughly 3000 tiles per hour, the MK7’s OK/NOK verdicts tracked the human sonador and a reference inspector, and caught cracks the ear missed. The one catch surfaced when an unloading robot left a tile out of position: an off-centre hammer strike raised a peak near 520 to 560 Hz that mimicked a defect, so hammer repeatability is the point to watch in any line automation.

Key takeaway: Cracks shift roof tile resonance frequencies by up to 10.7 percent, well beyond the drift from mass, engobe or temperature. That margin lets automated impulse excitation match or beat human tap-testing at 3000 tiles per hour, as long as the hammer keeps hitting the tile centre.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does automated acoustic resonance testing compare to manual tapping by operators?
In-line trials on a French tile plant showed that GrindoSonic MK7 OK/NOK decisions matched those of the human 'sonador' when the automated hammer struck the centre of the tile, and in some cases caught cracks that were difficult to hear by ear. The instrument adds repeatability, digital traceability, and removes the fatigue and musculoskeletal risk of repetitive manual tapping at roughly 3000 tiles per hour.
Can impulse excitation handle the complex geometry of roof tiles?
Yes. Tiles with valleys, interlocking lugs and grooves produce a richer acoustic signature with more peaks than a simple tile or brick. A single tap excites flexural, torsional and longitudinal-compression modes together, and the MK7 reads them all in one FFT spectrum; the impact point (centre, corner or tip) sets which modes stand out. Cracks reduced the characteristic frequencies by 3.8 to 6.6 percent for light fissures and 6.7 to 10.7 percent for severe cracks, far larger than the variation from mass, thickness, engobe or temperature.
What is the main pitfall when automating in-line acoustic control?
Repeatability of the hammer impact point. When the automated hammer struck more than about 6.5 cm off the tile centre, an additional residual peak appeared around 520 to 560 Hz that mimicked a defect and produced false positives, confusing both the instrument and the human operator. Synchronising the hammer-tile position, often governed by an unloading robot, is the critical control point in any automation project.

Ready to Get Started?

Contact us for a feasibility assessment or request sample testing.