Thomas

Thomas

  • Joined: April 2, 2025
  • Articles: 4

Impulse Excitation vs Destructive Testing

Impulse Excitation vs Destructive Testing

In the realm of material testing, understanding the difference between impulse excitation and destructive testing is crucial. Impulse excitation offers a non-invasive approach, allowing for real-time assessment of structural integrity without compromising the material. Conversely, destructive testing provides definitive results through the material's breaking point but at the expense of its usability. By prioritizing impulse excitation, we embrace a philosophy of measuring reality over mere assumption, leading to safer and more efficient engineering practices.

From Motion to Modulus: How Vibrations Expose Rigidity

By Nicoguaro - Own work, CC BY 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=89891144

In the world of materials science, vibrations serve as a powerful diagnostic tool. By analyzing how structures respond to various frequencies, engineers can uncover hidden rigidities that may compromise performance. This blog post explores the fascinating relationship between motion and modulus, revealing how vibrations not only expose weaknesses but also inform design choices. Join us as we delve into the science behind this vibrational insight and its implications for the future of engineering.

De-Risking Additive Manufacturing Through Non-Destructive Testing Methods

As the adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) grows, so does the need to ensure part integrity and reliability. Non-destructive testing (NDT) methods play a crucial role in de-risking AM processes by identifying potential defects without compromising the components. From ultrasound to X-ray techniques, integrating NDT early in the production cycle enhances quality control, boosts confidence in AM technologies, and ultimately leads to safer, more efficient manufacturing outcomes.

What an Impulse Can Tell You About Material Quality and Strength

Resonance frequency testing uses motion to reveal what’s really inside a material—how stiff it is, how consistent, and whether anything’s hiding beneath the surface. With just a tap, engineers can read how the structure resists internal motion. This makes it a fast, non-destructive way to evaluate quality, detect flaws, and confirm material performance—across metals, composites, and advanced manufacturing. It replaces assumptions with real physical behavior, helping teams catch problems early and make better decisions with confidence.

Trending now

Material Research
Ceramics
Metallurgy
Grinding and Abrasives